Certification takes 6-18 months, and the critical path is usually the same: processes in place, about three
months of records, one complete internal audit cycle, one management review, then stage 1 and stage 2.
scripts/roadmap.py builds the dated plan, estimates audit days and checks whether a target date is realistic.
Trigger Conditions
Activate this skill when the user:
- Asks how long ISO 9001 certification will take or when they could be certified
- Has a customer deadline for certification
- Needs a project plan, Gantt or budget for management approval
- Asks how many audit days, how surveillance works, or how to choose a certification body
Start with iso-9001-gap-analyzer to set the maturity input honestly.
Workflow
1. INPUTS -> start date, effective personnel in scope, sites, maturity (none / basic / partial), target date
2. PLAN -> python scripts/roadmap.py --start 2026-11-02 --employees 40 --maturity basic --target 2027-09-30
3. ADJUST -> if the target is not achievable: add resources, reuse existing systems, or move the date
4. CB -> shortlist accredited certification bodies; request quotes for the 3-year cycle
5. GOVERN -> sponsor, project lead, process owners, fortnightly steering, milestones
6. TRACK -> re-run the plan monthly with actual progress; report slippage to the sponsorCritical Path
| Milestone | Cannot be shortened because |
|---|---|
| Processes implemented | The audit samples real practice, not documents |
| ~3 months of records | Auditors need evidence the system operates over time |
| Full internal audit cycle | Required (9.2) before stage 1; checks every process and clause |
| Management review | Required (9.3) with all inputs, including audit results |
| Stage 1 -> stage 2 | Concerns must be closed; the CB schedules both |
| Nonconformity closure | Majors must be verified before the certification decision |
Stage 2 audit (certification) 2027-08-09 2027-08-16 1 Stage 2 report: recommendation or nonconformities
Certificate expected: 2027-09-27 (~11 months)
Audit days (IAF MD 5, before CB adjustments): initial 4 (stage 1 + stage 2)
Target 2027-06-30: NOT achievable - 19 days short; raise maturity (consultant, existing system) or move the dateStage-by-stage process, entry criteria for stage 1, CB selection and safe ways to speed up: certification-process.md. IAF MD 5 table, complexity adjustments, typical durations, governance and timeline risks: audit-time-and-planning.md.
Output Format
Deliver:
- Assumptions - headcount, sites, maturity, design responsibility, resources.
- Roadmap - phases with dates, durations and deliverables (from
roadmap.py). - Certificate date and whether the target is achievable, with slack or shortfall.
- Audit days and 3-year cycle - initial, surveillance and recertification estimates.
- Governance and budget - sponsor, lead, steering rhythm, cost items.
- Top risks to the timeline with mitigations.
Scripts
python scripts/roadmap.py --start 2026-11-02 --employees 40
python scripts/roadmap.py --start 2026-11-02 --employees 180 --maturity partial --target 2027-06-30
python scripts/roadmap.py --start 2026-11-02 --employees 12 --maturity basic --jsonExit codes: 0 plan printed (and target met), 1 target not achievable, 2 usage error.
Additional Resources
| File | Content |
|---|---|
| certification-process.md | ISO/IEC 17021-1 steps, stage 1 entry criteria, nonconformity closure, CB selection, speeding up safely |
| audit-time-and-planning.md | IAF MD 5 audit-day table and adjustments, typical durations, governance, timeline risks |
8d-problem-solving-report-writer
Write and review 8D problem-solving reports for customer complaints and serious nonconformities (automotive and aerospace practice: Ford Global 8D, VDA, GM, Stellantis formats): D0 emergency response, D1 cross-functional team and champion, D2 problem description with 5W2H and is / is-not and no cause in the statement, D3 interim containment within 24 hours with verification and clean point, D4 verified occurrence and escape (non-detection) root causes plus systemic cause, D5 permanent corrective actions for each cause verified before implementation, D6 implementation, validation with production data and removal of containment, D7 PFMEA, control plan and read-across to similar products, D8 closure and recognition. Checks an 8D discipline by discipline for missing content, human-error root causes, missing escape cause or action, late containment and dates out of order.
acceptance-sampling-plan-selector
Select and evaluate acceptance sampling plans for incoming, in-process and final inspection: ANSI/ASQ Z1.4 / ISO 2859-1 single sampling under normal inspection (code letter from lot size and inspection level I, II, III, S-1 to S-4; sample size, Ac and Re from AQL, following the table's arrows to the correct plan; 100% when n reaches the lot size; AQLs above 10 per 100 units), operating characteristic curves (Pa at any quality, producer's quality level, indifference point, LTPD, AOQ and AOQL, binomial or hypergeometric), plans designed from producer and consumer risk, and c = 0 zero-acceptance plans. Covers AQL choice by defect class, switching rules between normal, tightened and reduced inspection, when sampling is not appropriate, and random sampling.
approved-supplier-list-manager
Manage and audit an approved supplier list (ASL) / external provider register for ISO 9001 8.4.1, IATF 16949 8.4 and AS9100 8.4.1: supplier status (approved, conditional, probation, pending, disqualified), scope of approval by commodity and process, risk class, certification and expiry, re-evaluation intervals by risk, conditions with end dates, single-source contingency, approver and customer-directed sources. Audits the list for expired or expiring certificates, overdue re-evaluations, conditional or probation status past its decision date, high-risk suppliers without the required certification, single-source suppliers without backup and missing approvers, and checks purchase orders for suppliers that are off-list, disqualified or pending, or buying outside the approved scope. Covers ERP blocks, PO requirements, off-list and emergency purchases.
apqp-phase-planner
Plan and track Advanced Product Quality Planning (AIAG APQP 3rd edition, IATF 16949) for a new or changed automotive part: back-schedule the five phases (plan and define, product design, process design, product and process validation, launch and feedback) from the start-of-production date by program complexity, with overlap, PPAP lead and safe-launch period; list the deliverables and gate for each phase (DFMEA, DVP&R, feasibility, process flow, PFMEA, control plans, MSA, Ppk, run at rate, PPAP, safe launch, lessons learned); adjust for build-to-print suppliers; flag compressed timelines and late or untracked deliverables against a status list. Covers gate reviews, red/yellow/green status reporting, run at rate and safe-launch exit criteria.
as9100-gap-analyzer
Run an AS9100D / EN 9100:2018 gap analysis for aviation, space and defence suppliers on the requirements added to ISO 9001: on-time delivery and conformity focus, management representative, ethics and human-factors awareness, operational planning and operational risk management, configuration management, product safety, counterfeit-part prevention, special requirements, critical items and key characteristics, external provider register and flow-down, FOD prevention, tooling and NC program control, special process validation, first article inspection (AS9102), traceability, in-service data and nonconforming product control. Generates and scores a worksheet, grades missing core controls as major, and checks invalid n/a claims. Covers AS9101/AS9104, OASIS, AS9102 FAI forms, counterfeit standards (AS5553, AS6174, AS6081), NADCAP and the planned IA9100 transition.
audit-report-writer
Write internal, supplier and pre-certification audit reports with the content ISO 19011:2018 6.5 expects: audit objectives, scope, criteria with revisions, dates, team and auditees, method and sampling statement, specific strengths, findings table and three-part finding details (requirement, evidence, statement), conclusion on the degree of fulfilment of criteria, diverging opinions, follow-up deadlines and distribution. Builds a Markdown report from a JSON audit record, generates the conclusion from the findings (major / minor / none) and flags reports missing required content or findings without clause or evidence. Covers conclusion wording, closing meetings, response expectations and verifying corrective actions.