Skip to content
v0.1.3latest release121 skills4 categories6 sub-categories247 tested scripts397 reference docsContact us

supplier-development-plan-writer

Prioritise and plan supplier development (IATF 16949 8.4.2.5, ISO 9001 8.4): rank suppliers by spend share, risk, performance gap and single-source exposure; decide develop, replace or monitor; and draft a dated 90-day development plan per selected supplier with kick-off, joint assessment, signed action plan, levers matched to each gap (process control, MSA, capability, problem solving, delivery and planning, APQP/PPAP, quality system, special processes, sub-tier control), on-site verification and close-out, plus PPM, OTD and score targets. Covers the develop-or-replace matrix, signs a development effort will or will not work, governance and records. Use when a key supplier keeps failing the scorecard, after repeated SCARs, when planning supplier quality engineering effort for the year, or before resourcing a part.

Supplier development is an investment: it pays off for strategic, hard-to-replace suppliers who are willing to change, and wastes effort on small, replaceable ones. scripts/dev_plan.py ranks suppliers, decides develop / replace / monitor, and drafts a dated 90-day plan with the right levers for each gap.

Trigger Conditions

Activate this skill when the user:

  • Has a key supplier with poor scorecard results or repeated SCARs
  • Is planning where supplier quality engineers should spend their time
  • Must decide whether to develop or resource a supplier
  • Needs a supplier development plan for a customer or IATF audit

Inputs: supplier-quality-scorecard-builder for scores, supplier-corrective-action-request-writer for open SCARs.

Workflow

text
1. DATA     -> supplier, spend, score, ppm, otd, risk, strategic, single_source, gaps
2. RANK     -> python scripts/dev_plan.py suppliers.csv --top 3 --start 2026-11-02
3. DECIDE   -> DEVELOP / REPLACE / MONITOR; confirm with purchasing (develop-or-replace.md)
4. KICK-OFF -> supplier management commits owner, data and targets
5. EXECUTE  -> levers per gap; weekly calls, monthly steering (plan-structure.md)
6. CLOSE    -> day 90 review: monitor, escalate or resource

Example

text
Supplier           Spend %  Score    Risk   Index  Decision
CastCorp             31.1%     52    high   67.15  DEVELOP
SmallParts            1.6%     61     low    0.61  REPLACE
## Development plan: CastCorp  (score 52, PPM 7,600, OTD 81%)
Targets at day 90: PPM <= 3,800 (then <= 500), OTD >= 95%, score >= 80
  2026-12-02  day 30  process control: Control plan review on key characteristics; SPC with reaction plans; LPA at the supplier

Decision matrix and signs of success or failure: develop-or-replace.md. The 90-day structure, levers by gap, targets and governance: plan-structure.md.

Output Format

Deliver the priority table with decisions, then for each supplier to develop: current performance, targets, the dated plan with owners, governance rhythm and the close-out criteria. List the suppliers to resource with the reason.

Scripts

bash
python scripts/dev_plan.py suppliers.csv --top 3 --start 2026-11-02
python scripts/dev_plan.py suppliers.csv --ppm-target 500 --otd-target 95

Columns: supplier, spend, score, ppm, otd, risk, strategic, single_source, gaps (;-separated). Exit codes: 0 plan printed, 2 usage or data error.

Additional Resources

FileContent
develop-or-replace.mdDecision matrix, priority index, signs development will or will not work
plan-structure.md90-day plan, levers by gap, targets, governance
More in Quality Management & ISO 9001

8d-problem-solving-report-writer

Write and review 8D problem-solving reports for customer complaints and serious nonconformities (automotive and aerospace practice: Ford Global 8D, VDA, GM, Stellantis formats): D0 emergency response, D1 cross-functional team and champion, D2 problem description with 5W2H and is / is-not and no cause in the statement, D3 interim containment within 24 hours with verification and clean point, D4 verified occurrence and escape (non-detection) root causes plus systemic cause, D5 permanent corrective actions for each cause verified before implementation, D6 implementation, validation with production data and removal of containment, D7 PFMEA, control plan and read-across to similar products, D8 closure and recognition. Checks an 8D discipline by discipline for missing content, human-error root causes, missing escape cause or action, late containment and dates out of order.

acceptance-sampling-plan-selector

Select and evaluate acceptance sampling plans for incoming, in-process and final inspection: ANSI/ASQ Z1.4 / ISO 2859-1 single sampling under normal inspection (code letter from lot size and inspection level I, II, III, S-1 to S-4; sample size, Ac and Re from AQL, following the table's arrows to the correct plan; 100% when n reaches the lot size; AQLs above 10 per 100 units), operating characteristic curves (Pa at any quality, producer's quality level, indifference point, LTPD, AOQ and AOQL, binomial or hypergeometric), plans designed from producer and consumer risk, and c = 0 zero-acceptance plans. Covers AQL choice by defect class, switching rules between normal, tightened and reduced inspection, when sampling is not appropriate, and random sampling.

approved-supplier-list-manager

Manage and audit an approved supplier list (ASL) / external provider register for ISO 9001 8.4.1, IATF 16949 8.4 and AS9100 8.4.1: supplier status (approved, conditional, probation, pending, disqualified), scope of approval by commodity and process, risk class, certification and expiry, re-evaluation intervals by risk, conditions with end dates, single-source contingency, approver and customer-directed sources. Audits the list for expired or expiring certificates, overdue re-evaluations, conditional or probation status past its decision date, high-risk suppliers without the required certification, single-source suppliers without backup and missing approvers, and checks purchase orders for suppliers that are off-list, disqualified or pending, or buying outside the approved scope. Covers ERP blocks, PO requirements, off-list and emergency purchases.

apqp-phase-planner

Plan and track Advanced Product Quality Planning (AIAG APQP 3rd edition, IATF 16949) for a new or changed automotive part: back-schedule the five phases (plan and define, product design, process design, product and process validation, launch and feedback) from the start-of-production date by program complexity, with overlap, PPAP lead and safe-launch period; list the deliverables and gate for each phase (DFMEA, DVP&R, feasibility, process flow, PFMEA, control plans, MSA, Ppk, run at rate, PPAP, safe launch, lessons learned); adjust for build-to-print suppliers; flag compressed timelines and late or untracked deliverables against a status list. Covers gate reviews, red/yellow/green status reporting, run at rate and safe-launch exit criteria.

as9100-gap-analyzer

Run an AS9100D / EN 9100:2018 gap analysis for aviation, space and defence suppliers on the requirements added to ISO 9001: on-time delivery and conformity focus, management representative, ethics and human-factors awareness, operational planning and operational risk management, configuration management, product safety, counterfeit-part prevention, special requirements, critical items and key characteristics, external provider register and flow-down, FOD prevention, tooling and NC program control, special process validation, first article inspection (AS9102), traceability, in-service data and nonconforming product control. Generates and scores a worksheet, grades missing core controls as major, and checks invalid n/a claims. Covers AS9101/AS9104, OASIS, AS9102 FAI forms, counterfeit standards (AS5553, AS6174, AS6081), NADCAP and the planned IA9100 transition.

audit-report-writer

Write internal, supplier and pre-certification audit reports with the content ISO 19011:2018 6.5 expects: audit objectives, scope, criteria with revisions, dates, team and auditees, method and sampling statement, specific strengths, findings table and three-part finding details (requirement, evidence, statement), conclusion on the degree of fulfilment of criteria, diverging opinions, follow-up deadlines and distribution. Builds a Markdown report from a JSON audit record, generates the conclusion from the findings (major / minor / none) and flags reports missing required content or findings without clause or evidence. Covers conclusion wording, closing meetings, response expectations and verifying corrective actions.