Skip to content
v0.1.3latest release121 skills4 categories6 sub-categories247 tested scripts397 reference docsContact us

Classification Metrics

Reference for ml-success-metric-selector · 101 lines

AI & Machine Learning / Classical Machine Learningv1.0.0Updated OCT 25 20264 references2 scripts

Notation: TP, FP, FN, TN from the confusion matrix at a threshold; P = TP + FN positives; N = FP + TN negatives.

Threshold metrics

MetricFormulaUseMisleads when
Accuracy(TP + TN) / (P + N)balanced classes, equal costsclasses are imbalanced
Balanced accuracy(TPR + TNR) / 2imbalanced, both classes mattercosts are very asymmetric
Precision (PPV)TP / (TP + FP)cost of acting on false alarmsfew predicted positives (noisy)
Recall (TPR, sensitivity)TP / Pcost of missing positivesused alone (flag everything = 1.0)
Specificity (TNR)TN / Nscreening negatives-
FPRFP / Nfalse-decline / false-alarm rate-
F12PR / (P + R)quick single number when costs unknowncosts differ; TN matter
F-beta(1+β²)PR / (β²P + R)recall β times as important as precisionβ chosen arbitrarily
MCC(TP·TN − FP·FN) / sqrt((TP+FP)(TP+FN)(TN+FP)(TN+FN))one balanced number, uses all four cellsyou need an interpretable business number
Cohen's kappa(p_o − p_e) / (1 − p_e)agreement beyond chanceprevalence extreme (kappa paradox)

Ranking metrics (threshold-free)

ROC-AUC

Probability that a random positive scores above a random negative. 0.5 = random, 1.0 = perfect. Insensitive to prevalence, which is both its strength (comparable across datasets) and its weakness (at 0.1% prevalence an AUC of 0.95 can still mean precision of 2% at useful recall).

PR-AUC / average precision

Area under precision-recall; average_precision_score computes the step-wise sum Σ (R_k − R_{k−1}) P_k. Random = prevalence (not 0.5). Focuses on the top of the ranking, where rare-event decisions are made. Do not use trapezoidal interpolation of the PR curve (auc(recall, precision)): it is optimistic.

Partial AUC

ROC-AUC restricted to FPR ≤ x (roc_auc_score(..., max_fpr=0.05), McClish-standardised). Use when only a low false-positive region is operationally relevant (fraud, screening).

Precision@K, recall@K, lift@K

Sort by score, take K. Lift = precision@K / prevalence. The right metric for capacity-bound actions.

Probability metrics

MetricFormulaNotes
Log loss−mean(y log p + (1−y) log(1−p))proper scoring rule; punishes confident mistakes; baseline = entropy of the prior
Briermean((p − y)²)proper scoring rule; bounded; decomposes into calibration + refinement
ECEΣ_bins (n_b/n) ·mean p_b − frac positive_b

A model can have excellent AUC and terrible calibration (any monotone transform keeps AUC). Calibrate with CalibratedClassifierCV(method="isotonic" | "sigmoid") on held-out data when probabilities are consumed. Resampling (SMOTE, undersampling) and class_weight distort probabilities; recalibrate afterwards.

Multiclass averaging

AverageComputesUse
micropool all TP/FP/FN over classesequals accuracy for single-label multiclass
macrounweighted mean of per-class metricevery class equally important
weightedmean weighted by class supportfrequency = importance

Report the per-class table (classification_report) whenever classes differ in importance. Multiclass ROC-AUC: roc_auc_score(y, P, multi_class="ovr", average="macro") or "ovo" (insensitive to imbalance).

Confusion-matrix costs

text
               predicted 0     predicted 1
actual 0       0 (TN)          C_fp
actual 1       C_fn            C_tp (often negative = benefit)

Expected cost per row = (FP·C_fp + FN·C_fn + TP·C_tp) / n. For calibrated p, predict 1 when p·(C_fn − C_tp) > (1−p)·C_fp, i.e. p > C_fp / (C_fp + C_fn − C_tp).

scikit-learn calls

python
from sklearn.metrics import (accuracy_score, average_precision_score, balanced_accuracy_score, brier_score_loss,
                             classification_report, confusion_matrix, f1_score, fbeta_score, log_loss,
                             matthews_corrcoef, precision_recall_curve, roc_auc_score, top_k_accuracy_score)
from sklearn.calibration import calibration_curve

roc_auc_score(y, p)
average_precision_score(y, p)
roc_auc_score(y, p, max_fpr=0.05)
log_loss(y, p); brier_score_loss(y, p)
frac_pos, mean_pred = calibration_curve(y, p, n_bins=10, strategy="quantile")
fbeta_score(y, p >= t, beta=2)
top_k_accuracy_score(y_multi, P, k=3)

TunedThresholdClassifierCV (scikit-learn >= 1.5) selects a threshold by cross-validation for a chosen scorer, including a custom cost scorer built with make_scorer.

Common mistakes

  • Reporting accuracy or F1 at 0.5 for an imbalanced problem.
  • Comparing PR-AUC across datasets with different prevalence (normalise by prevalence: lift).
  • Choosing the threshold on the test set and reporting the test metric at it.
  • Averaging per-fold precision when folds have very different predicted-positive counts (pool instead).
  • Treating AUC differences of 0.005 as meaningful without a paired test.
More in Classical Machine Learning

anomaly-detection-model-builder

Build and evaluate anomaly detection for tabular, sensor and transaction data with few or no labels: define the anomaly type (point, contextual, collective), choose detectors (robust z-score/MAD and IQR rules, Mahalanobis with robust covariance, k-NN distance, LOF, Isolation Forest, one-class SVM, PCA reconstruction / autoencoders, forecasting residuals for time series), combine them by rank, explain each alert by its deviating features, set thresholds from an alert budget or the score distribution, and evaluate with precision@k, PR-AUC and recall on known incidents, or detector agreement when no labels exist. Includes pure-Python detectors (robust z, Mahalanobis, kNN, Isolation Forest, ensemble) and an evaluation script.

catboost-model-builder

Build CatBoost models that use its strengths correctly: raw categorical columns as cat_features (ordered target statistics, no manual encoding), text_features, Pool construction with NaN-safe categories, ordered boosting and has_time for temporal data, symmetric (oblivious) trees, overfitting detector with eval_set and use_best_model, losses for classification, regression (Quantile, Poisson, Tweedie) and ranking (YetiRank), class weights, monotone constraints, feature importance (PredictionValuesChange, LossFunctionChange) and SHAP values, GPU training and model export. Plans cat/text/numeric columns from a CSV and generates a runnable training script, and checks parameter sets for the conflicts CatBoost rejects (iterations vs n_estimators, Bayesian bootstrap with subsample, multiple class-weight options, depth > 16, use_best_model without eval_set).

categorical-encoding-selector

Choose and implement the right encoding for every categorical column given the model family and the data: one-hot (with infrequent-level grouping and handle_unknown), ordinal with an explicit order, cross-fitted target encoding (scikit-learn TargetEncoder, CatBoost ordered statistics, category_encoders inside CV), frequency/count encoding, feature hashing, native categorical support in LightGBM, HistGradientBoosting, XGBoost and CatBoost, prefix levels for codes (zip3, NAICS-2), and embeddings. Measures cardinality, rare-level share, unseen-level rate on a time-ordered holdout and target signal per column, emits the ColumnTransformer, and quantifies target-encoding leakage (in-sample vs out-of-fold vs holdout AUC).

classification-model-selector

Choose the right classification algorithm for tabular, text or mixed data and prove the choice with a fair bake-off: logistic regression (L2, L1, elastic net), linear SVM, naive Bayes, k-NN, RBF SVM, decision trees, random forest, extra trees, HistGradientBoosting, LightGBM, XGBoost, CatBoost, explainable boosting machines (EBM/GAM), points scorecards and MLPs, matched to data size, width, categorical and high-cardinality share, missingness, class imbalance, text, and constraints such as interpretability, monotonic constraints, calibrated probabilities, latency budgets and tiny deployable models. Ranks candidates with starting hyperparameters and cautions, then generates a bake-off script running every candidate on identical CV folds with per-fold metrics, fit time and prediction latency.

clustering-algorithm-selector

Choose the right clustering algorithm and check that clustering makes sense at all: cluster tendency (Hopkins statistic with a correlated-features caveat, nearest-neighbour isolation), then k-means / MiniBatchKMeans, Gaussian mixtures with BIC, agglomerative (Ward, average, complete, single) with dendrograms, DBSCAN, HDBSCAN, OPTICS, spectral clustering, BIRCH, mean shift, k-prototypes and k-modes for mixed or categorical data, and Gower distance, matched to data size, expected shapes, noise, varying density, known k, soft memberships, hierarchy and streaming. Covers preprocessing (scaling, encoding, dimensionality, distance metrics), validation (internal indices, bootstrap stability, external labels, business profiling) and assigning new points.

collaborative-filtering-implementer

Implement collaborative filtering recommenders that beat popularity: item-based kNN with cosine, Jaccard or asymmetric similarity, shrinkage, neighbourhood size, positive-only or mean-centred rating signals and 'because you liked X' explanations; implicit ALS with confidence weighting, BPR pairwise ranking and the closed-form EASE model in plain NumPy, tuned on a temporal validation split by recall@k and NDCG@k and refit on all data; plus user-kNN, explicit matrix factorisation, the implicit/LightFM libraries, hyperparameter ranges, cold-start fallbacks, scaling with sparse matrices and approximate nearest neighbours. Produces top-k lists in the format of the recommendation evaluator.