Skip to content
v0.1.4latest release159 skills5 categories7 sub-categories303 tested scripts468 reference docsContact us

speaking-rubric-builder

Build and validate speaking assessment rubrics for language learners: holistic vs analytic vs checklist, criteria (fluency and coherence, lexical resource, grammatical range and accuracy, pronunciation and intelligibility, interactive communication, task achievement), band descriptors written from the middle band out with observable features and consistent frequency words, a sample 4-band B1 rubric, task types that elicit each level, rater standardisation with benchmarks, double rating and rater effects. Checks a rubric for missing bands, near-identical adjacent bands, purely evaluative descriptors, native-speaker benchmarks and too many bands or criteria, and measures two-rater agreement (exact, adjacent, quadratic weighted kappa, severity) listing performances that need a third rating. Use when designing a speaking test or rubric, training raters, or checking marking consistency.

Languages, Linguistics & Translation / Language Teachingv1.0.0Updated OCT 25 20262 references2 scripts

A speaking rubric works when its criteria match the task, each band describes observable features that change from one band to the next, and trained raters agree. scripts/rubric_check.py checks the rubric; scripts/rater_agreement.py checks the raters.

Trigger Conditions

Activate this skill when the user:

  • Needs a rubric or band descriptors for a speaking test or classroom speaking task
  • Wants a speaking task that elicits a level (interview, long turn, discussion, role play)
  • Is training or standardising raters
  • Has two teachers' scores and wants to know if they agree

Writing rubrics: writing-rubric-for-l2-builder. Placement interviews: language-placement-test-builder.

Workflow

text
1. PURPOSE   -> placement, progress, achievement, certification; level(s); stakes
2. TASKS     -> at least two task types that elicit the level (references/speaking-criteria.md)
3. TYPE      -> holistic / analytic / checklist
4. CRITERIA  -> 3-5 that match the construct
5. BANDS     -> 4-6 bands; write the middle band first; observable features; consistent frequency words
6. CHECK     -> python scripts/rubric_check.py rubric.csv
7. STANDARD  -> benchmarks, practice, qualification (references/rater-standardisation.md)
8. AGREEMENT -> python scripts/rater_agreement.py double_ratings.csv

Review Codes

CodeSeverityProblem
SR001highCriterion missing a band
SR002mediumAdjacent bands nearly identical
SR003mediumPurely evaluative descriptor
SR004mediumNative-speaker benchmark
SR005 / SR006lowToo few or too many bands or criteria
RA001highUnder 90% of ratings within one band
RA002mediumWeighted kappa under 0.60
RA003lowOne rater harsher by over 0.5 band
RA004lowRatings two or more bands apart

Output Format

The task(s) with instructions and timing, the rubric as a criteria x bands table, scoring and level conversion rules, and the rubric_check.py result. For rater checks, the agreement summary with actions (re-standardise, third ratings, feedback on severity).

Scripts

bash
python scripts/rubric_check.py rubric.csv

Columns: criterion, band, descriptor. Exit codes: 0 no high findings, 1 high findings, 2 read error.

bash
python scripts/rater_agreement.py scores.csv

Columns: student, rater_a, rater_b (optional criterion). Exit codes: 0 no high findings, 1 high findings, 2 read error or fewer than two rows.

Additional Resources

FileContent
speaking-criteria.mdHolistic vs analytic, core criteria with band features, writing descriptors, sample B1 rubric, task types by level
rater-standardisation.mdStandardisation session, rating practice, double rating targets, rater effects, converting bands to scores
More in Language Teaching

academic-english-eap-course-planner

Plan English for Academic Purposes (EAP) courses: pre-sessional, in-sessional, foundation, IELTS preparation and discipline-specific EAP, with syllabus strands (academic reading, lecture listening and note-taking, essay and report writing, paraphrase, summary and synthesis, referencing and plagiarism, seminars and presentations, academic vocabulary, critical thinking), a 10-week pre-sessional outline, exit assessment, IELTS-CEFR alignment and academic style (formality, hedging, cohesion, reporting verbs). Estimates study hours and weeks to close an IELTS gap from overall or per-skill scores (IELTS rounding, minimum per skill, priority skills, feasibility before a deadline), and checks learner texts for contractions, informal words with academic alternatives, unhedged claims, 'you', And/But/So starts, rhetorical questions and missing citations.

actfl-proficiency-curriculum-mapper

Map world language curricula to the ACTFL framework: proficiency levels (Novice, Intermediate, Advanced, Superior, Distinguished with sublevels), functions, contexts, text types and accuracy, proficiency vs performance, the three modes of communication (interpretive, interpersonal, presentational), the 5 Cs World-Readiness Standards, backward-designed thematic units with Integrated Performance Assessments, typical programme targets and FSI time estimates. Looks up approximate ACTFL-CEFR-ILR equivalences with what each level can do, and checks a unit map for missing modes, rehearsed skits mislabelled as interpersonal, translation or word lists as interpretive tasks, and units without an integrated performance assessment.

adult-literacy-esl-lesson-builder

Build lessons for adult ESL learners who are developing literacy (LESLLA learners: pre-literate, non-literate, semi-literate, literate in a non-Roman script): learner profiles and sensitive initial assessment, principles (oral language first, known to new, systematic phonics with adult-relevant text, repetition, classroom skills, respect for experience), a lesson routine (oral warm-up, review, new grapheme, blending, segmenting, decodable text, writing, functional literacy, Language Experience Approach), a phonics sequence for adults, sight words, functional literacy targets (forms, signs, medicine labels) and portfolio assessment. Checks whether a reading text is decodable with the letter-sound patterns and sight words taught so far, catching untaught digraphs, listing non-decodable words with the untaught part, and suggesting the most useful next patterns.

authentic-material-lesson-adapter

Turn authentic material (news articles, podcasts, videos, songs, menus, timetables, adverts, social media posts, forms, infographics) into language lessons by grading the task rather than the text. Selects texts for interest, relevance, exploitability, coverage, cultural load and rights; finds the 4-6 words to pre-teach, words to gloss on the page and words learners can ignore, plus names and cultural references to explain, with reading time by level; and builds a lesson shape (lead-in, pre-teach, gist or scanning, graded detail task, language focus on chunks and register, response) with task ideas per material type and level from A1 to C1. Covers copyright, fair dealing and fair use, Creative Commons and attribution.

can-do-statement-writer

Write and review can-do statements for language courses, units, lessons and learner self-assessment, CEFR or NCSSFL-ACTFL style: action (observable verb) + text or situation + level-specific conditions, learner ('I can') and descriptor ('Can') versions, progressions of one activity from A1 to C1, and coverage of reception, production, interaction and mediation. Includes a verb bank by mode and level and condition and text-type banks. Lints statements for teacher-centred phrasing, knowledge instead of use (learn, know, understand the passive), missing context, two skills in one statement, vague quality words, grammar items as outcomes, overlong statements and missing modes in a set.

cefr-aligned-syllabus-builder

Build language course syllabuses aligned to the CEFR (A1-C2, plus levels, Companion Volume 2020): entry and exit levels, guided learning hours and course length (with an L1-distance adjustment), syllabus type (topic, functional-notional, task-based, skills-based, multi-strand), unit-by-unit can-do outcomes, grammar from a core inventory by level, vocabulary, functions, pronunciation, balance of reception, production, interaction and mediation, recycling and assessment points. Checks a syllabus for units without can-do statements, core grammar for the level not covered, items above the course level, skills missing from most units and units with no vocabulary or functions.