Coursebook dialogues often sound like two people reading sentences at each other. A good classroom dialogue models the target language and the way people actually talk, at a level learners can handle.
Features of natural spoken English
| Feature | Example | Use from |
|---|---|---|
| Contractions | I'm, don't, it's, we'll, can't | A1 |
| Short answers and ellipsis | "Coffee?" "Yes, please." / "Been there?" | A1 |
| Reactions and backchannels | Oh! Really? Great. Right. Uh-huh. | A1 |
| Openings and closings | Hi, how are you? / Anyway, I'd better go. See you! | A1 |
| Discourse markers | Well, So, Anyway, Actually, By the way | A2 |
| Fillers and hesitation | Um, er, let me see, you know | A2 |
| Vague language | and stuff, sort of, about twenty, or something | B1 |
| Questions to keep talk going | What about you? How was it? | A1 |
| Repair | Sorry? Pardon? I mean... What I meant was... | A2 |
| Hedging and softening | I'm not sure, but... It might be... a bit | B1 |
| Overlaps, interruptions, incomplete sentences | "I was going to-" "Oh, sorry, go on." | B2 |
| Idioms and chunks | I'm in a hurry; no way; that makes sense | B1 |
Use them in moderation: too many fillers makes a model dialogue hard to follow at low levels.
Adjacency pairs (turn types that come together)
| First part | Expected second part | Alternatives |
|---|---|---|
| Greeting | Greeting | |
| Question | Answer | "I'm not sure." "Why?" |
| Offer | Accept / decline | "Thanks, but..." |
| Request | Grant / refuse with reason | "Sorry, I can't, because..." |
| Invitation | Accept / decline with excuse | "I'd love to, but..." |
| Complaint | Apology / explanation | |
| Compliment | Thanks / downplay | "Oh, it's quite old." |
Declining and refusing need softening and a reason; learners should see this modelled.
Dialogue length and turn length by level
| Level | Turns | Max words per turn | Language |
|---|---|---|---|
| A1 | 6-10 | ~12 | Formulaic exchanges, present simple, can |
| A2 | 8-14 | ~18 | Past simple, going to, requests and offers |
| B1 | 10-18 | ~25 | Opinions, suggestions, narrative turns |
| B2 | 10-24 | ~35 | Persuasion, hedging, longer anecdotes |
| C1-C2 | Any | Any | Implicature, irony, register shifts |
Writing process
- Define the situation: where, who, relationship (formality), goal of each speaker.
- List the target language (3-6 phrases) and decide where each occurs naturally.
- Draft the skeleton: opening -> purpose -> problem or complication -> resolution -> closing.
- Add natural features appropriate to the level.
- Balance the roles if learners will practise in pairs (each speaker roughly half of the words).
- Read it aloud with a partner; cut anything nobody would say.
- Check with
dialogue_check.py.
Complication makes it worth listening to
A dialogue with a small problem (the room is not ready, the size is wrong, the friend is late) gives a reason to listen and generates functional language (apologising, suggesting, negotiating).
Register
| Situation | Register cues |
|---|---|
| Friends | Hi, Hey, Yeah, What's up?, Cheers, See ya |
| Service encounter | Good morning, Can I help you?, Could I..., Here you are, Have a nice day |
| Workplace | Have you got a minute?, Would it be possible to..., Shall we... |
| Formal / official | Would you mind..., I'm afraid..., I'd be grateful if... |
Names and representation
Use a variety of names, ages, roles and backgrounds; avoid stereotypes (who is the doctor, who cooks); include L2 speakers as successful communicators.
academic-english-eap-course-planner
Plan English for Academic Purposes (EAP) courses: pre-sessional, in-sessional, foundation, IELTS preparation and discipline-specific EAP, with syllabus strands (academic reading, lecture listening and note-taking, essay and report writing, paraphrase, summary and synthesis, referencing and plagiarism, seminars and presentations, academic vocabulary, critical thinking), a 10-week pre-sessional outline, exit assessment, IELTS-CEFR alignment and academic style (formality, hedging, cohesion, reporting verbs). Estimates study hours and weeks to close an IELTS gap from overall or per-skill scores (IELTS rounding, minimum per skill, priority skills, feasibility before a deadline), and checks learner texts for contractions, informal words with academic alternatives, unhedged claims, 'you', And/But/So starts, rhetorical questions and missing citations.
actfl-proficiency-curriculum-mapper
Map world language curricula to the ACTFL framework: proficiency levels (Novice, Intermediate, Advanced, Superior, Distinguished with sublevels), functions, contexts, text types and accuracy, proficiency vs performance, the three modes of communication (interpretive, interpersonal, presentational), the 5 Cs World-Readiness Standards, backward-designed thematic units with Integrated Performance Assessments, typical programme targets and FSI time estimates. Looks up approximate ACTFL-CEFR-ILR equivalences with what each level can do, and checks a unit map for missing modes, rehearsed skits mislabelled as interpersonal, translation or word lists as interpretive tasks, and units without an integrated performance assessment.
adult-literacy-esl-lesson-builder
Build lessons for adult ESL learners who are developing literacy (LESLLA learners: pre-literate, non-literate, semi-literate, literate in a non-Roman script): learner profiles and sensitive initial assessment, principles (oral language first, known to new, systematic phonics with adult-relevant text, repetition, classroom skills, respect for experience), a lesson routine (oral warm-up, review, new grapheme, blending, segmenting, decodable text, writing, functional literacy, Language Experience Approach), a phonics sequence for adults, sight words, functional literacy targets (forms, signs, medicine labels) and portfolio assessment. Checks whether a reading text is decodable with the letter-sound patterns and sight words taught so far, catching untaught digraphs, listing non-decodable words with the untaught part, and suggesting the most useful next patterns.
authentic-material-lesson-adapter
Turn authentic material (news articles, podcasts, videos, songs, menus, timetables, adverts, social media posts, forms, infographics) into language lessons by grading the task rather than the text. Selects texts for interest, relevance, exploitability, coverage, cultural load and rights; finds the 4-6 words to pre-teach, words to gloss on the page and words learners can ignore, plus names and cultural references to explain, with reading time by level; and builds a lesson shape (lead-in, pre-teach, gist or scanning, graded detail task, language focus on chunks and register, response) with task ideas per material type and level from A1 to C1. Covers copyright, fair dealing and fair use, Creative Commons and attribution.
can-do-statement-writer
Write and review can-do statements for language courses, units, lessons and learner self-assessment, CEFR or NCSSFL-ACTFL style: action (observable verb) + text or situation + level-specific conditions, learner ('I can') and descriptor ('Can') versions, progressions of one activity from A1 to C1, and coverage of reception, production, interaction and mediation. Includes a verb bank by mode and level and condition and text-type banks. Lints statements for teacher-centred phrasing, knowledge instead of use (learn, know, understand the passive), missing context, two skills in one statement, vague quality words, grammar items as outcomes, overlong statements and missing modes in a set.
cefr-aligned-syllabus-builder
Build language course syllabuses aligned to the CEFR (A1-C2, plus levels, Companion Volume 2020): entry and exit levels, guided learning hours and course length (with an L1-distance adjustment), syllabus type (topic, functional-notional, task-based, skills-based, multi-strand), unit-by-unit can-do outcomes, grammar from a core inventory by level, vocabulary, functions, pronunciation, balance of reception, production, interaction and mediation, recycling and assessment points. Checks a syllabus for units without can-do statements, core grammar for the level not covered, items above the course level, skills missing from most units and units with no vocabulary or functions.