Skip to content
v0.1.4latest release159 skills5 categories7 sub-categories303 tested scripts468 reference docsContact us

dialogue-for-classroom-writer

Write natural model dialogues for language classes that contain the target language, suit the level and sound spoken rather than written: situation, speakers' goals and a small complication, contractions, reactions and backchannels, discourse markers, repair and softening, adjacency pairs, register, turn and dialogue length by CEFR level, balanced roles for pair practice and diverse characters. Checks a dialogue for missing target phrases, unbalanced roles, turns too long for the level, full forms with no contractions, no natural spoken features and wrong length, and plans exploitation: prediction, gist and detail listening, noticing, drilling, disappearing and jumbled dialogues, substitution, role cards and recording. Use when a teacher needs a dialogue or conversation script for a lesson, a listening script to record, or wants a coursebook dialogue made more natural.

Languages, Linguistics & Translation / Language Teachingv1.0.0Updated OCT 25 20262 references1 script

A model dialogue should do two jobs: present the target language in context and show how people really talk. scripts/dialogue_check.py checks a draft for the target phrases, role balance, turn length for the level and natural spoken features.

Trigger Conditions

Activate this skill when the user:

  • Needs a dialogue for a functional language lesson (ordering, booking, complaining, inviting)
  • Wants a script to record for a listening task
  • Has a stiff coursebook dialogue to rewrite
  • Needs role-play material derived from a model dialogue

Listening tasks on the recording: listening-task-builder. Role play activities: communicative-activity-generator.

Workflow

text
1. SITUATION -> place, speakers, relationship (register), each speaker's goal, a small complication
2. TARGET    -> 3-6 phrases and where they naturally occur
3. DRAFT     -> opening -> purpose -> complication -> resolution -> closing
4. NATURAL   -> contractions, reactions, discourse markers for the level (references/natural-dialogue-features.md)
5. CHECK     -> python scripts/dialogue_check.py dialogue.txt --level A2 --target "Can I have" "How much"
6. READ      -> read aloud; cut anything nobody would say
7. EXPLOIT   -> listening tasks, drills, disappearing dialogue, role cards (references/dialogue-exploitation.md)

Review Codes (dialogue_check.py)

CodeSeverityProblem
DC001highTarget phrase missing
DC002highFewer than two speakers
DC003mediumOne speaker has over 65% of the words
DC004mediumTurn too long for the level
DC005lowFull forms with no contractions
DC006lowNo reactions, fillers or discourse markers
DC007lowToo few or too many turns for the level

Output Format

The dialogue in "Speaker: line" format with target phrases in bold, a one-line situation, then the dialogue_check.py result and an exploitation plan (listening tasks, drill lines with stress marked, practice steps, role cards for the freer stage).

Scripts

bash
python scripts/dialogue_check.py dialogue.txt [--level A2] [--target "Can I have" "How much"]

One turn per line as Name: text. Exit codes: 0 no high findings, 1 high findings, 2 read error.

Additional Resources

FileContent
natural-dialogue-features.mdSpoken features by level, adjacency pairs, length by level, writing process, complications, register, representation
dialogue-exploitation.mdLesson stages for a dialogue, disappearing and jumbled dialogues, role cards, recording tips
More in Language Teaching

academic-english-eap-course-planner

Plan English for Academic Purposes (EAP) courses: pre-sessional, in-sessional, foundation, IELTS preparation and discipline-specific EAP, with syllabus strands (academic reading, lecture listening and note-taking, essay and report writing, paraphrase, summary and synthesis, referencing and plagiarism, seminars and presentations, academic vocabulary, critical thinking), a 10-week pre-sessional outline, exit assessment, IELTS-CEFR alignment and academic style (formality, hedging, cohesion, reporting verbs). Estimates study hours and weeks to close an IELTS gap from overall or per-skill scores (IELTS rounding, minimum per skill, priority skills, feasibility before a deadline), and checks learner texts for contractions, informal words with academic alternatives, unhedged claims, 'you', And/But/So starts, rhetorical questions and missing citations.

actfl-proficiency-curriculum-mapper

Map world language curricula to the ACTFL framework: proficiency levels (Novice, Intermediate, Advanced, Superior, Distinguished with sublevels), functions, contexts, text types and accuracy, proficiency vs performance, the three modes of communication (interpretive, interpersonal, presentational), the 5 Cs World-Readiness Standards, backward-designed thematic units with Integrated Performance Assessments, typical programme targets and FSI time estimates. Looks up approximate ACTFL-CEFR-ILR equivalences with what each level can do, and checks a unit map for missing modes, rehearsed skits mislabelled as interpersonal, translation or word lists as interpretive tasks, and units without an integrated performance assessment.

adult-literacy-esl-lesson-builder

Build lessons for adult ESL learners who are developing literacy (LESLLA learners: pre-literate, non-literate, semi-literate, literate in a non-Roman script): learner profiles and sensitive initial assessment, principles (oral language first, known to new, systematic phonics with adult-relevant text, repetition, classroom skills, respect for experience), a lesson routine (oral warm-up, review, new grapheme, blending, segmenting, decodable text, writing, functional literacy, Language Experience Approach), a phonics sequence for adults, sight words, functional literacy targets (forms, signs, medicine labels) and portfolio assessment. Checks whether a reading text is decodable with the letter-sound patterns and sight words taught so far, catching untaught digraphs, listing non-decodable words with the untaught part, and suggesting the most useful next patterns.

authentic-material-lesson-adapter

Turn authentic material (news articles, podcasts, videos, songs, menus, timetables, adverts, social media posts, forms, infographics) into language lessons by grading the task rather than the text. Selects texts for interest, relevance, exploitability, coverage, cultural load and rights; finds the 4-6 words to pre-teach, words to gloss on the page and words learners can ignore, plus names and cultural references to explain, with reading time by level; and builds a lesson shape (lead-in, pre-teach, gist or scanning, graded detail task, language focus on chunks and register, response) with task ideas per material type and level from A1 to C1. Covers copyright, fair dealing and fair use, Creative Commons and attribution.

can-do-statement-writer

Write and review can-do statements for language courses, units, lessons and learner self-assessment, CEFR or NCSSFL-ACTFL style: action (observable verb) + text or situation + level-specific conditions, learner ('I can') and descriptor ('Can') versions, progressions of one activity from A1 to C1, and coverage of reception, production, interaction and mediation. Includes a verb bank by mode and level and condition and text-type banks. Lints statements for teacher-centred phrasing, knowledge instead of use (learn, know, understand the passive), missing context, two skills in one statement, vague quality words, grammar items as outcomes, overlong statements and missing modes in a set.

cefr-aligned-syllabus-builder

Build language course syllabuses aligned to the CEFR (A1-C2, plus levels, Companion Volume 2020): entry and exit levels, guided learning hours and course length (with an L1-distance adjustment), syllabus type (topic, functional-notional, task-based, skills-based, multi-strand), unit-by-unit can-do outcomes, grammar from a core inventory by level, vocabulary, functions, pronunciation, balance of reception, production, interaction and mediation, recycling and assessment points. Checks a syllabus for units without can-do statements, core grammar for the level not covered, items above the course level, skills missing from most units and units with no vocabulary or functions.