Skip to content
v0.1.3latest release121 skills4 categories6 sub-categories247 tested scripts397 reference docsContact us

Reading SHAP

Reference for shap-value-explainer · 63 lines

AI & Machine Learning / Classical Machine Learningv1.0.0Updated OCT 25 20263 references4 scripts

Plot types

PlotShowsRead it as
Bar (mean |SHAP|)global importancehow much the output moves because of each feature, on average
Beeswarmevery row's SHAP, coloured by feature valuedirection (red right = high values raise), spread, outliers
Dependence / scatterSHAP vs feature value, coloured by a second featureshape of the effect, thresholds, interaction (vertical spread by colour)
Waterfallone row, base to predictionwhy this prediction
Forcethe same as waterfall, horizontallycompact local view
Decision plotcumulative paths for many rowshow groups of rows diverge
Heatmaprows x featuresclusters of explanations
python
e = shap.Explanation(values=sv, base_values=base, data=X.values, feature_names=list(X.columns))
shap.plots.beeswarm(e, max_display=15)
shap.plots.scatter(e[:, "tenure_months"], color=e)        # colour by the strongest interacting feature
shap.plots.waterfall(e[17])

What shap_summary.py's columns mean

ColumnMeaningWatch for
mean|SHAP|average absolute contributioncompare within one model and one output space only
sharefraction of the totala single feature > 50%: check for leakage
meanaverage signed contributionfar from 0: the background differs from the explained rows
rhoSpearman(value, SHAP)sign against domain knowledge: proxy, leakage or a data bug
spreadSHAP variance not explained by the feature's own value> 20%: the effect depends on context
partnerfeature with the strongest within-chunk correlation with the SHAP valuesconfirm with interaction values or 2-D PDP

Correlated features

SHAP divides credit between correlated features, and how it divides depends on the explainer:

  • Interventional SHAP breaks correlations: it evaluates combinations that may not occur in reality.
  • Path-dependent SHAP follows the tree's splits: a feature used first takes more credit.

Mitigations: group correlated features (sum their SHAP) and report the group; drop redundant features and refit; report the correlation next to the ranking.

Pitfalls

PitfallCorrect practice
"SHAP says raising tenure lowers churn"SHAP describes the model, not interventions; causal claims need experiments or causal models
Ranking with one-hot levels separatelysum levels per input feature first
Comparing SHAP across models in different spaceslog-odds and probability values are not comparable
Explaining the training setexplain held-out, production-like rows
Reading tiny features' shapesbelow ~5% share, shapes are mostly noise
Trusting a surprising directioncheck the data: leakage, encoding errors, target defined after the feature
Different backgrounds across reportsfix and document the background

Wording for stakeholders

  • "On average the model predicts 17% churn. For this customer it predicts 94%. The biggest reasons are 12 support calls in the last quarter (strongly raises the risk) and the basic plan (raises it a little)."
  • "Across all customers, tenure has the largest influence. Newer customers are scored as riskier."
  • Add: "This explains how the model scores customers. It does not prove that changing these factors would change behaviour."
  • Avoid raw log-odds in stakeholder text. Use probabilities for the base and the prediction, and words (strongly / slightly raises) for the contributions.
More in Classical Machine Learning

anomaly-detection-model-builder

Build and evaluate anomaly detection for tabular, sensor and transaction data with few or no labels: define the anomaly type (point, contextual, collective), choose detectors (robust z-score/MAD and IQR rules, Mahalanobis with robust covariance, k-NN distance, LOF, Isolation Forest, one-class SVM, PCA reconstruction / autoencoders, forecasting residuals for time series), combine them by rank, explain each alert by its deviating features, set thresholds from an alert budget or the score distribution, and evaluate with precision@k, PR-AUC and recall on known incidents, or detector agreement when no labels exist. Includes pure-Python detectors (robust z, Mahalanobis, kNN, Isolation Forest, ensemble) and an evaluation script.

catboost-model-builder

Build CatBoost models that use its strengths correctly: raw categorical columns as cat_features (ordered target statistics, no manual encoding), text_features, Pool construction with NaN-safe categories, ordered boosting and has_time for temporal data, symmetric (oblivious) trees, overfitting detector with eval_set and use_best_model, losses for classification, regression (Quantile, Poisson, Tweedie) and ranking (YetiRank), class weights, monotone constraints, feature importance (PredictionValuesChange, LossFunctionChange) and SHAP values, GPU training and model export. Plans cat/text/numeric columns from a CSV and generates a runnable training script, and checks parameter sets for the conflicts CatBoost rejects (iterations vs n_estimators, Bayesian bootstrap with subsample, multiple class-weight options, depth > 16, use_best_model without eval_set).

categorical-encoding-selector

Choose and implement the right encoding for every categorical column given the model family and the data: one-hot (with infrequent-level grouping and handle_unknown), ordinal with an explicit order, cross-fitted target encoding (scikit-learn TargetEncoder, CatBoost ordered statistics, category_encoders inside CV), frequency/count encoding, feature hashing, native categorical support in LightGBM, HistGradientBoosting, XGBoost and CatBoost, prefix levels for codes (zip3, NAICS-2), and embeddings. Measures cardinality, rare-level share, unseen-level rate on a time-ordered holdout and target signal per column, emits the ColumnTransformer, and quantifies target-encoding leakage (in-sample vs out-of-fold vs holdout AUC).

classification-model-selector

Choose the right classification algorithm for tabular, text or mixed data and prove the choice with a fair bake-off: logistic regression (L2, L1, elastic net), linear SVM, naive Bayes, k-NN, RBF SVM, decision trees, random forest, extra trees, HistGradientBoosting, LightGBM, XGBoost, CatBoost, explainable boosting machines (EBM/GAM), points scorecards and MLPs, matched to data size, width, categorical and high-cardinality share, missingness, class imbalance, text, and constraints such as interpretability, monotonic constraints, calibrated probabilities, latency budgets and tiny deployable models. Ranks candidates with starting hyperparameters and cautions, then generates a bake-off script running every candidate on identical CV folds with per-fold metrics, fit time and prediction latency.

clustering-algorithm-selector

Choose the right clustering algorithm and check that clustering makes sense at all: cluster tendency (Hopkins statistic with a correlated-features caveat, nearest-neighbour isolation), then k-means / MiniBatchKMeans, Gaussian mixtures with BIC, agglomerative (Ward, average, complete, single) with dendrograms, DBSCAN, HDBSCAN, OPTICS, spectral clustering, BIRCH, mean shift, k-prototypes and k-modes for mixed or categorical data, and Gower distance, matched to data size, expected shapes, noise, varying density, known k, soft memberships, hierarchy and streaming. Covers preprocessing (scaling, encoding, dimensionality, distance metrics), validation (internal indices, bootstrap stability, external labels, business profiling) and assigning new points.

collaborative-filtering-implementer

Implement collaborative filtering recommenders that beat popularity: item-based kNN with cosine, Jaccard or asymmetric similarity, shrinkage, neighbourhood size, positive-only or mean-centred rating signals and 'because you liked X' explanations; implicit ALS with confidence weighting, BPR pairwise ranking and the closed-form EASE model in plain NumPy, tuned on a temporal validation split by recall@k and NDCG@k and refit on all data; plus user-kNN, explicit matrix factorisation, the implicit/LightFM libraries, hyperparameter ranges, cold-start fallbacks, scaling with sparse matrices and approximate nearest neighbours. Produces top-k lists in the format of the recommendation evaluator.