Skip to content
v0.1.4latest release159 skills5 categories7 sub-categories303 tested scripts468 reference docsContact us

Giving Pronunciation Feedback

Reference for pronunciation-feedback-for-teachers-tool · 63 lines

Languages, Linguistics & Translation / Language Teachingv1.0.0Updated OCT 25 20263 references2 scripts

Priorities: intelligibility first

Aim for learners to be easily understood by a range of listeners, not to sound like a particular native accent. Jenkins' Lingua Franca Core suggests what matters most for international intelligibility:

Matters mostMatters less
Most consonant sounds (but th and dark l are less critical)/θ/ and /ð/ (substitutes like /t/, /f/ are usually understood)
Vowel length contrasts (ship/sheep)Exact vowel quality
Consonant clusters at the start of words (no deletion)Weak forms (useful for listening more than speaking)
Nuclear (sentence) stress: stressing the key wordWord stress in rare words; pitch movements
Aspiration of /p/ /t/ /k/Features of connected speech in production

Teachers working towards a specific exam or workplace may add features (e.g. word stress for presentations).

Diagnosis

  1. Record a short sample: read a diagnostic passage + 1 minute of free speech.
  2. Note problems by area: individual sounds, clusters, word stress, sentence stress, intonation, connected speech.
  3. Mark each as high (affects intelligibility) or low (accent).
  4. Compare with likely L1 issues (l1_issues.py) but trust what you hear.
  5. Choose 2-3 priorities per learner; share them with the learner.

Feedback techniques in class

TechniqueHowFor
Model and drillModel 2-3 times naturally; choral then individual repetitionNew items, sounds
Back-chainingBuild from the end: -gether / to-gether / al-to-getherLong words, clusters, sentences
Isolate and recombineSay the sound alone, then in the word, then in the sentenceIndividual sounds
Articulation description"Lips round", "tongue tip behind the top teeth", "voice on/off" (hand on throat)Sounds new to the L1
Visual aidsMirror, mouth diagrams, phonemic chart, waveform/pitch appsSelf-monitoring
Minimal pairsDiscriminate then produce (minimal_pairs.py)Contrasts
Stress markingUnderline, ● o, clap or tap stressed syllables; stretch the vowelWord and sentence stress
Kazoo / hummingHum the intonation patternIntonation
Recast with emphasis"Not bark: PARK."Quick correction during speaking
Finger / gesturePoint to the problem sound in a word-on-fingersSelf-correction
ShadowingSpeak along with a recordingRhythm, connected speech
Recording and self-reviewLearner records, compares with a model, notes 2 improvementsAutonomy

Written pronunciation feedback (for recordings)

text
Strengths: Clear word stress in "important" and "development"; good pace.
Priority 1: /p/ vs /b/ - "bark" for "park" (00:12), "ben" for "pen" (00:31).
  Practise: paper strip test; minimal pairs p-b; record the sentences again.
Priority 2: Sentence stress - stress the new information: "I went to the BEACH, not the PARK."
Next recording: read the same text again and compare.

Phonemic symbols

Use the phonemic chart for sounds the learners struggle with; teach symbols gradually (the ones for problem contrasts first). Learners use dictionary transcriptions to check new words.

Sensitivity

  • Accent is part of identity; frame feedback as clarity, not "correct" vs "wrong" accents.
  • Avoid laughing at mispronunciations or imitating learners.
  • Private feedback for recordings; choral drills before individual drills to lower anxiety.
More in Language Teaching

academic-english-eap-course-planner

Plan English for Academic Purposes (EAP) courses: pre-sessional, in-sessional, foundation, IELTS preparation and discipline-specific EAP, with syllabus strands (academic reading, lecture listening and note-taking, essay and report writing, paraphrase, summary and synthesis, referencing and plagiarism, seminars and presentations, academic vocabulary, critical thinking), a 10-week pre-sessional outline, exit assessment, IELTS-CEFR alignment and academic style (formality, hedging, cohesion, reporting verbs). Estimates study hours and weeks to close an IELTS gap from overall or per-skill scores (IELTS rounding, minimum per skill, priority skills, feasibility before a deadline), and checks learner texts for contractions, informal words with academic alternatives, unhedged claims, 'you', And/But/So starts, rhetorical questions and missing citations.

actfl-proficiency-curriculum-mapper

Map world language curricula to the ACTFL framework: proficiency levels (Novice, Intermediate, Advanced, Superior, Distinguished with sublevels), functions, contexts, text types and accuracy, proficiency vs performance, the three modes of communication (interpretive, interpersonal, presentational), the 5 Cs World-Readiness Standards, backward-designed thematic units with Integrated Performance Assessments, typical programme targets and FSI time estimates. Looks up approximate ACTFL-CEFR-ILR equivalences with what each level can do, and checks a unit map for missing modes, rehearsed skits mislabelled as interpersonal, translation or word lists as interpretive tasks, and units without an integrated performance assessment.

adult-literacy-esl-lesson-builder

Build lessons for adult ESL learners who are developing literacy (LESLLA learners: pre-literate, non-literate, semi-literate, literate in a non-Roman script): learner profiles and sensitive initial assessment, principles (oral language first, known to new, systematic phonics with adult-relevant text, repetition, classroom skills, respect for experience), a lesson routine (oral warm-up, review, new grapheme, blending, segmenting, decodable text, writing, functional literacy, Language Experience Approach), a phonics sequence for adults, sight words, functional literacy targets (forms, signs, medicine labels) and portfolio assessment. Checks whether a reading text is decodable with the letter-sound patterns and sight words taught so far, catching untaught digraphs, listing non-decodable words with the untaught part, and suggesting the most useful next patterns.

authentic-material-lesson-adapter

Turn authentic material (news articles, podcasts, videos, songs, menus, timetables, adverts, social media posts, forms, infographics) into language lessons by grading the task rather than the text. Selects texts for interest, relevance, exploitability, coverage, cultural load and rights; finds the 4-6 words to pre-teach, words to gloss on the page and words learners can ignore, plus names and cultural references to explain, with reading time by level; and builds a lesson shape (lead-in, pre-teach, gist or scanning, graded detail task, language focus on chunks and register, response) with task ideas per material type and level from A1 to C1. Covers copyright, fair dealing and fair use, Creative Commons and attribution.

can-do-statement-writer

Write and review can-do statements for language courses, units, lessons and learner self-assessment, CEFR or NCSSFL-ACTFL style: action (observable verb) + text or situation + level-specific conditions, learner ('I can') and descriptor ('Can') versions, progressions of one activity from A1 to C1, and coverage of reception, production, interaction and mediation. Includes a verb bank by mode and level and condition and text-type banks. Lints statements for teacher-centred phrasing, knowledge instead of use (learn, know, understand the passive), missing context, two skills in one statement, vague quality words, grammar items as outcomes, overlong statements and missing modes in a set.

cefr-aligned-syllabus-builder

Build language course syllabuses aligned to the CEFR (A1-C2, plus levels, Companion Volume 2020): entry and exit levels, guided learning hours and course length (with an L1-distance adjustment), syllabus type (topic, functional-notional, task-based, skills-based, multi-strand), unit-by-unit can-do outcomes, grammar from a core inventory by level, vocabulary, functions, pronunciation, balance of reception, production, interaction and mediation, recycling and assessment points. Checks a syllabus for units without can-do statements, core grammar for the level not covered, items above the course level, skills missing from most units and units with no vocabulary or functions.