The default answer
Gradient-boosted trees remain the strongest general choice for medium-sized tabular data (thousands to millions of rows, heterogeneous features). Several benchmark studies (Grinsztajn et al. 2022, "Why do tree-based models still outperform deep learning on tabular data?"; Shwartz-Ziv & Armon 2021) found GBMs ahead on most datasets at a fraction of the tuning cost. Reasons: tabular features are heterogeneous and non-smooth, many are uninformative, and trees are invariant to monotone transforms.
When neural networks are worth trying
| Situation | Why NN can help |
|---|---|
| Very large data (10M+ rows) with complex interactions | capacity, minibatch training |
| Mixed modalities (tabular + text/images) | one model with embeddings for each |
| Very high-cardinality IDs with lots of data (users, items) | learned embeddings |
| Online / continual learning | incremental updates |
| Ensembling with GBMs | diversity often gives small gains |
| Small data with strong priors (in-context foundation models) | TabPFN-style models trained on synthetic tasks can be strong on small tables |
What to try (in order of effort)
- MLP with good preprocessing: quantile-transformed numerics, embeddings for categoricals, dropout, weight decay, early stopping. A well-tuned MLP is a reasonable NN baseline.
- Residual MLP / FT-Transformer (feature tokenisation + transformer) from libraries such as
rtdl/ PyTorch Tabular. - Pretrained tabular foundation models (TabPFN family) for small datasets: check size limits and licence.
Practical rules
- Compare against a tuned GBM with the same folds and tuning budget.
- Scale inputs (QuantileTransformer works well); handle missing values explicitly.
- Expect more tuning and compute; budget it before starting.
- If a NN wins by a small margin, consider whether the operational cost (GPU, serving, monitoring) is worth it.
anomaly-detection-model-builder
Build and evaluate anomaly detection for tabular, sensor and transaction data with few or no labels: define the anomaly type (point, contextual, collective), choose detectors (robust z-score/MAD and IQR rules, Mahalanobis with robust covariance, k-NN distance, LOF, Isolation Forest, one-class SVM, PCA reconstruction / autoencoders, forecasting residuals for time series), combine them by rank, explain each alert by its deviating features, set thresholds from an alert budget or the score distribution, and evaluate with precision@k, PR-AUC and recall on known incidents, or detector agreement when no labels exist. Includes pure-Python detectors (robust z, Mahalanobis, kNN, Isolation Forest, ensemble) and an evaluation script.
catboost-model-builder
Build CatBoost models that use its strengths correctly: raw categorical columns as cat_features (ordered target statistics, no manual encoding), text_features, Pool construction with NaN-safe categories, ordered boosting and has_time for temporal data, symmetric (oblivious) trees, overfitting detector with eval_set and use_best_model, losses for classification, regression (Quantile, Poisson, Tweedie) and ranking (YetiRank), class weights, monotone constraints, feature importance (PredictionValuesChange, LossFunctionChange) and SHAP values, GPU training and model export. Plans cat/text/numeric columns from a CSV and generates a runnable training script, and checks parameter sets for the conflicts CatBoost rejects (iterations vs n_estimators, Bayesian bootstrap with subsample, multiple class-weight options, depth > 16, use_best_model without eval_set).
categorical-encoding-selector
Choose and implement the right encoding for every categorical column given the model family and the data: one-hot (with infrequent-level grouping and handle_unknown), ordinal with an explicit order, cross-fitted target encoding (scikit-learn TargetEncoder, CatBoost ordered statistics, category_encoders inside CV), frequency/count encoding, feature hashing, native categorical support in LightGBM, HistGradientBoosting, XGBoost and CatBoost, prefix levels for codes (zip3, NAICS-2), and embeddings. Measures cardinality, rare-level share, unseen-level rate on a time-ordered holdout and target signal per column, emits the ColumnTransformer, and quantifies target-encoding leakage (in-sample vs out-of-fold vs holdout AUC).
clustering-algorithm-selector
Choose the right clustering algorithm and check that clustering makes sense at all: cluster tendency (Hopkins statistic with a correlated-features caveat, nearest-neighbour isolation), then k-means / MiniBatchKMeans, Gaussian mixtures with BIC, agglomerative (Ward, average, complete, single) with dendrograms, DBSCAN, HDBSCAN, OPTICS, spectral clustering, BIRCH, mean shift, k-prototypes and k-modes for mixed or categorical data, and Gower distance, matched to data size, expected shapes, noise, varying density, known k, soft memberships, hierarchy and streaming. Covers preprocessing (scaling, encoding, dimensionality, distance metrics), validation (internal indices, bootstrap stability, external labels, business profiling) and assigning new points.
collaborative-filtering-implementer
Implement collaborative filtering recommenders that beat popularity: item-based kNN with cosine, Jaccard or asymmetric similarity, shrinkage, neighbourhood size, positive-only or mean-centred rating signals and 'because you liked X' explanations; implicit ALS with confidence weighting, BPR pairwise ranking and the closed-form EASE model in plain NumPy, tuned on a temporal validation split by recall@k and NDCG@k and refit on all data; plus user-kNN, explicit matrix factorisation, the implicit/LightFM libraries, hyperparameter ranges, cold-start fallbacks, scaling with sparse matrices and approximate nearest neighbours. Produces top-k lists in the format of the recommendation evaluator.
counterfactual-explanation-generator
Generate counterfactual explanations and algorithmic recourse: the smallest realistic change to a row's features that changes the model's decision. Solves exact minimal-cost recourse for linear and logistic models (MAD-scaled L1 cost, immutable features, increase/decrease directions, bounds, integer and binary features, diverse alternatives, features every counterfactual must change, and a no-recourse finding when immutable features decide), generates DiCE counterfactuals for any scikit-learn model with constraints turned into permitted ranges and every result re-predicted, and validates counterfactuals from any method for constraint violations, implausible values, off-manifold rows, broken derived-feature relations and failure to flip the prediction.