Skip to content
v0.1.4latest release159 skills5 categories7 sub-categories303 tested scripts468 reference docsContact us
scripts/task_check.py
#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""Check a task-based lesson against Ellis's task criteria and the Willis TBL framework.

JSON:
  {
    "title": "Plan a class trip",
    "instructions": "In groups, agree on one day trip for the class within a 30 euro budget per person",
    "gap": "opinion",                       # information / opinion / reasoning
    "outcome": "One trip plan per group, presented to the class, then a class vote",
    "stages": [
      {"name": "Pre-task", "minutes": 8, "procedure": "Topic intro, brainstorm places, model recording"},
      {"name": "Task", "minutes": 12}, {"name": "Planning", "minutes": 8}, {"name": "Report", "minutes": 10},
      {"name": "Language focus", "minutes": 15, "procedure": "Ss find suggestion phrases in the transcript"}
    ]
  }

Checks:
  TB001 high    instructions focus on form ('use the present perfect', 'make sentences with'): an exercise, not a task
  TB002 high    no information, opinion or reasoning gap
  TB003 high    no non-linguistic outcome (decision, list, plan, solution, ranking, product)
  TB004 medium  pre-task pre-teaches the target structure: learners should draw on their own resources first
  TB005 medium  Willis stage missing (pre-task, task, planning, report, language focus)
  TB006 medium  language focus comes before the task
  TB007 low     no task repetition or planning time before the report
  TB008 low     a stage has no time limit

Usage:
    python task_check.py tbl.json

Exit codes: 0 no high findings, 1 high findings, 2 read or JSON error.
"""

import argparse
import json
import re
import sys

FORM = re.compile(r"\b(use|using|practi[cs]e|make sentences with|with the|correct form of)\s+(the\s+)?"
                  r"(present|past|future|perfect|continuous|passive|conditional|modal|comparative|superlative|"
                  r"going to|used to|will future|tense|grammar|structure|target language)", re.I)
GAP_WORDS = re.compile(r"\b(agree|decide|choose|rank|find out|find the differences|compare|solve|plan|negotiate|"
                       r"persuade|guess|predict|missing information|information gap|discuss and)\b", re.I)
OUTCOME = re.compile(r"\b(list|plan|decision|ranking|ranked|solution|answer|map|poster|vote|choice|product|"
                     r"itinerary|recommendation|agreement|order|winner|report|timetable|menu|budget)\b", re.I)
PRETEACH = re.compile(r"\b(pre-?teach|present|drill|explain)\b.*\b(grammar|structure|tense|form|target language)\b", re.I)
STAGES = [("pre-task", r"pre-?task|intro"), ("task", r"^\s*task\b|task cycle"), ("planning", r"plan"),
          ("report", r"report|present"), ("language focus", r"language focus|analysis|focus on form|practice")]


def kind(name):
    for k, pat in STAGES:
        if re.search(pat, name, re.I):
            return k
    return None


def check(t):
    f = []
    ins = str(t.get("instructions", ""))
    if FORM.search(ins):
        f.append(("TB001", "high", f"instructions ask for '{FORM.search(ins).group(0)}': give a goal, not a structure"))
    if not (t.get("gap") or GAP_WORDS.search(ins)):
        f.append(("TB002", "high", "no gap: learners need to share information, opinions or reasoning to finish"))
    if not (t.get("outcome") and OUTCOME.search(str(t["outcome"]))):
        f.append(("TB003", "high", "no clear outcome: say what learners produce (a decision, list, plan, solution)"))
    stages = t.get("stages") or []
    kinds = [kind(str(s.get("name", ""))) for s in stages]
    for s, k in zip(stages, kinds):
        if k == "pre-task" and PRETEACH.search(str(s.get("procedure", ""))):
            f.append(("TB004", "medium", "pre-task teaches the structure: introduce topic and task, not the grammar"))
        if not s.get("minutes"):
            f.append(("TB008", "low", f"'{s.get('name')}' has no time limit"))
    missing = [k for k, _ in STAGES if k not in kinds]
    if missing:
        f.append(("TB005", "medium", f"Willis stage(s) missing: {', '.join(missing)}"))
    if "language focus" in kinds and "task" in kinds and kinds.index("language focus") < kinds.index("task"):
        f.append(("TB006", "medium", "language focus is before the task: put it after, built on what learners needed"))
    if "planning" not in kinds and not re.search(r"repeat|again|second time", " ".join(str(s) for s in stages), re.I):
        f.append(("TB007", "low", "no planning time or task repetition: learners have no chance to improve accuracy"))
    return f, kinds


def main():
    ap = argparse.ArgumentParser(description=__doc__, formatter_class=argparse.RawDescriptionHelpFormatter)
    ap.add_argument("tbl", help="task lesson JSON, or - for stdin")
    a = ap.parse_args()
    try:
        fh = sys.stdin if a.tbl == "-" else open(a.tbl, encoding="utf-8")
        with fh:
            t = json.load(fh)
        if not isinstance(t, dict):
            raise ValueError("JSON must be an object")
    except (OSError, ValueError) as e:
        print(f"error: {e}", file=sys.stderr)
        return 2
    f, kinds = check(t)
    crit = {c: not any(x[0] == c for x in f) for c in ("TB001", "TB002", "TB003")}
    print(f"{t.get('title', '(untitled)')}")
    print(f"Ellis criteria: meaning focus {'yes' if crit['TB001'] else 'NO'} | gap {'yes' if crit['TB002'] else 'NO'} | "
          f"outcome {'yes' if crit['TB003'] else 'NO'}")
    print("Stages: " + " -> ".join(k or "?" for k in kinds))
    order = {"high": 0, "medium": 1, "low": 2}
    for code, sev, msg in sorted(f, key=lambda x: (order[x[1]], x[0])):
        print(f"{code} [{sev}] {msg}")
    if not f:
        print("OK: a real task in a complete Willis cycle")
    return 1 if any(x[1] == "high" for x in f) else 0


if __name__ == "__main__":
    sys.exit(main())
More in Language Teaching

academic-english-eap-course-planner

Plan English for Academic Purposes (EAP) courses: pre-sessional, in-sessional, foundation, IELTS preparation and discipline-specific EAP, with syllabus strands (academic reading, lecture listening and note-taking, essay and report writing, paraphrase, summary and synthesis, referencing and plagiarism, seminars and presentations, academic vocabulary, critical thinking), a 10-week pre-sessional outline, exit assessment, IELTS-CEFR alignment and academic style (formality, hedging, cohesion, reporting verbs). Estimates study hours and weeks to close an IELTS gap from overall or per-skill scores (IELTS rounding, minimum per skill, priority skills, feasibility before a deadline), and checks learner texts for contractions, informal words with academic alternatives, unhedged claims, 'you', And/But/So starts, rhetorical questions and missing citations.

actfl-proficiency-curriculum-mapper

Map world language curricula to the ACTFL framework: proficiency levels (Novice, Intermediate, Advanced, Superior, Distinguished with sublevels), functions, contexts, text types and accuracy, proficiency vs performance, the three modes of communication (interpretive, interpersonal, presentational), the 5 Cs World-Readiness Standards, backward-designed thematic units with Integrated Performance Assessments, typical programme targets and FSI time estimates. Looks up approximate ACTFL-CEFR-ILR equivalences with what each level can do, and checks a unit map for missing modes, rehearsed skits mislabelled as interpersonal, translation or word lists as interpretive tasks, and units without an integrated performance assessment.

adult-literacy-esl-lesson-builder

Build lessons for adult ESL learners who are developing literacy (LESLLA learners: pre-literate, non-literate, semi-literate, literate in a non-Roman script): learner profiles and sensitive initial assessment, principles (oral language first, known to new, systematic phonics with adult-relevant text, repetition, classroom skills, respect for experience), a lesson routine (oral warm-up, review, new grapheme, blending, segmenting, decodable text, writing, functional literacy, Language Experience Approach), a phonics sequence for adults, sight words, functional literacy targets (forms, signs, medicine labels) and portfolio assessment. Checks whether a reading text is decodable with the letter-sound patterns and sight words taught so far, catching untaught digraphs, listing non-decodable words with the untaught part, and suggesting the most useful next patterns.

authentic-material-lesson-adapter

Turn authentic material (news articles, podcasts, videos, songs, menus, timetables, adverts, social media posts, forms, infographics) into language lessons by grading the task rather than the text. Selects texts for interest, relevance, exploitability, coverage, cultural load and rights; finds the 4-6 words to pre-teach, words to gloss on the page and words learners can ignore, plus names and cultural references to explain, with reading time by level; and builds a lesson shape (lead-in, pre-teach, gist or scanning, graded detail task, language focus on chunks and register, response) with task ideas per material type and level from A1 to C1. Covers copyright, fair dealing and fair use, Creative Commons and attribution.

can-do-statement-writer

Write and review can-do statements for language courses, units, lessons and learner self-assessment, CEFR or NCSSFL-ACTFL style: action (observable verb) + text or situation + level-specific conditions, learner ('I can') and descriptor ('Can') versions, progressions of one activity from A1 to C1, and coverage of reception, production, interaction and mediation. Includes a verb bank by mode and level and condition and text-type banks. Lints statements for teacher-centred phrasing, knowledge instead of use (learn, know, understand the passive), missing context, two skills in one statement, vague quality words, grammar items as outcomes, overlong statements and missing modes in a set.

cefr-aligned-syllabus-builder

Build language course syllabuses aligned to the CEFR (A1-C2, plus levels, Companion Volume 2020): entry and exit levels, guided learning hours and course length (with an L1-distance adjustment), syllabus type (topic, functional-notional, task-based, skills-based, multi-strand), unit-by-unit can-do outcomes, grammar from a core inventory by level, vocabulary, functions, pronunciation, balance of reception, production, interaction and mediation, recycling and assessment points. Checks a syllabus for units without can-do statements, core grammar for the level not covered, items above the course level, skills missing from most units and units with no vocabulary or functions.